Over the last couple of days, I've seen divisional realignment mentioned in two different articles. Apparently, it is something that Bud Selig and Major League Baseball are entertaining the thought of. I put a lot of thought into this topic, before coming up with my opinion fifteen seconds later. I'm all in favor of the idea. I think there could be some very interesting scenarios if MLB decides to shuffle the cards a little bit. I'll cut to the chase, here are the divisions that I came up with:
AL East | AL Central | AL West |
Toronto Blue Jays | Cleveland Indians | Seattle Mariners |
Boston Red Sox | Cincinnati Reds | Colorado Rockies |
Tampa Bay Rays | Milwaukee Brewers | Arizona Diamondbacks |
Florida Marlins | Minnesota Twins | Houston Astros |
| Detroit Tigers | Texas Rangers |
| | |
| | |
NL East | NL Central | NL West |
New York Yankees | Chicago White Sox | Oakland Athletics |
New York Mets | Chicago Cubs | San Francisco Giants |
Baltimore Orioles | Kansas City Royals | Los Angeles Dodgers |
Washington Nationals | St. Louis Cardinals | Los Angeles Angels |
Atlanta Braves | Philadelphia Phillies | San Diego Padres |
| Pittsburgh Pirates |
The article I first read on this topic was using the Red Sox' and Yankees' dominance over the last seven years as a reason for the divisions to be realigned. "The Red Sox and Yankees are both always in the playoffs, nobody else ever has a chance at the Wild Card, blah blah blah." Anyway, I don't agree that trading the Sox or Yankees to the AL Central would be any kind of solid solution to that "problem". You're still going to have both teams making the playoffs, now you're just screwing the Royals and giving the O's the slightest glimmer of false hope. And if you're going to all the trouble of changing things around, let's go crazy!
I grouped the thirty MLB teams into three geographic zones: east, west and central (with the central being a bit under-filled so I could use the AL Central and NL Central as something like "flex divisions"). I also ordered my lists from northernmost team to southernmost team. After that, I started grouping together teams that would make really good rivals or who were already really good rivals.
The simplest division was probably the NL West. I decided to put all the California teams in the same division. In this economy, cutting down on travel costs can't hurt. You can't split up the Dodgers and Giants, but wouldn't you want to see the A's-Giants and Angels-Dodgers eighteen times a year, too? Plus, there's the Padres. Somebody must have a rivalry with them, too.
Staying with the western theme, the next division I rounded up was the AL West. Unfortunately, this division's rivalries aren't nearly as riveting. I did pair up the Astros and Rangers, but the other three teams don't have any real connection to each other that I can think of. I could conceivably trade the Mariners to the NL West for the Padres and I wouldn't consider it much of a difference competition-wise. The travel aspect would make more sense anyway. San Diego is much closer to Arizona and Texas than Seattle is. It all pretty much boiled down to: "It would be neat to have a division made up of all California teams."
I decided to break apart the Sox-Yankees divisional rivalry. They could still play every year in interleague play, but it opens up the possibility for, possibly, one day, a Boston Red Sox versus New York Yankees World Series. I dumped the Yankees into the NL East along with their crosstown rivals the Mets. The Big Apple could enjoy their subway series six times a season. I wanted to put the Phillies and Pirates duo in this division also, but ultimately decided to go with the Baltimore Orioles and Washington Nationals. The Atlanta Braves made it into the division, too, based primarily on the fact that no baseball team plays in Savannah, GA.
The AL East. This division ends up being the puny 4-team grouping. The Red Sox are here, along with the Blue Jays, for some reason. Tampa Bay and their new rival, Florida, settles into the AL East as well. I think the Sox-Rays rivalry could be really entertaining as long as the Rays maintain their current philosophy, which seems to be working quite well for them. The Marlins are a pretty young, yet poor, team, that could benefit from eighteen visits per year from the Red Sox and eighteen heated intrastate grudge matches with Tampa.
For the NL Central, I knew that I needed to put six teams in here to leave each circuit with an even number of teams. My list of pairs still on the board were: Phillies/Pirates (destined to be a lopsided rivalry), White Sox/Cubs, Indians/Reds, Royals/Cardinals (a bit of a stretch, maybe). Then I presumed that the Twins and Brewers might be a good head-to-head pairing. And Michigan's up there, too, so why not add the Tigers in and call it, I believe the term is, ménage à trois. I'm also vaguely aware of some kind of Cubs-Cardinals rivalry that I suppose should be maintained. For that reason, Chicago, Chicago, Kansas City and St. Louis all go into the NL Central. Since the upper midwestern trio can't fit in there, they'll have to wait. I settled on Philadelphia and Pittsburgh rounding out the division. Which leaves...
The AL Central consists of the Detroit Tigers, the Minnesota Twins, the Milwaukee Brewers, the Cleveland Indians and the Cincinnati Reds. I think this division provides for some intriguing matchups. I guess.
In closing, I'd like to point out that the DH must be adopted by the NL for this procedure to work (Hank Aaron agrees). There are plenty of new rivalries to be formed out there, and it might be time to start exploring some of them. I'm 29 years old and a fan of the Red Sox, but I could imagine a day when the Sox-Yanks rivalry has just drained the life out of me. People in other states must be so tired of hearing about it. Abolishing it (even if only for a little while) might not be the most awful idea ever. Major League Baseball in the last twenty years has gone from two divisions to three, added a wild card playoff round, ignored steroids, instituted interleague play and killed off the Expos. It's not like they are afraid of making bold moves and big changes. The interleague action has pretty much minimized the divide between AL and NL, so swapping teams back and/or forth wouldn't be entirely shocking to the system. While I don't think Selig and the gang will do anything more than discuss realignment, I think it's an idea that makes good sense.